Naomi Klein Naomi Klein: La Stratégie Du Mensonge | Par Johan Norberg + - the klein doctrine: the rise of d
isaster polemics
cato.org/pubs/bp/bp102.pdf
en français: ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/0/15/15/76/lastrategiechoc.pdf
- réponse de klein
https://naomiklein.org/articles/2008/09/response-attacks
- réponse de norberg
cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9626
au pays de naomi il y a des mechants et des gentils
contrepoints.org/la-strategie-du-choc.html
"ce qui est sûr, cest que les chocs qui sont décrits dans le livre de klein ont presque toujours conduit à un élargissement et à un approfondissement des pouvoirs de lÉtat et non à leurs restrictions ou diminution. mais, bien sûr, klein ne le dira pas, car ça colle très mal avec sa thèse."
disaster statism
unlikelystories.org/bill0708.shtml
"klein's statism permeates the book. she never met a nationalization of property she didn't like. she equates government ownership of resources with people owning the resources. thinking the state is the people is a sure sign of statism. klein seems to celebrate any increase in state power, without an inkling that state power can only be extorted from society, from the sweat and blood of the people."
vulgar anti-corporatism
strike-the-root.com/81/bill/bill1.html
"i've noticed that many, perhaps even most, anti-capitalist types seem unable to tell the difference between market corporations/firms and political corporations/firms. let "vulgar anti-corporatism" refer to the error of lumping all corporations into the political corporatist pot--in other words, assuming that all corporations receive significant benefit from collusion with state. in fact, most corporations do not enjoy significant special favors, suffer net harm from the state, and are put at a disadvantage compared to competitors receiving state privilege."
dead left (written by a leftist )
tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=69067f1c-d089-474b-a8a0-945d1deb420b
"it ought to be morbidly embarrassing for a writer to discover that the central character of her narrative turns out to oppose what she identifies as the apotheosis of his own movement. and klein's mistake exposes the deeper flaw of her thesis. friedman opposed the war because he was a libertarian, and libertarian conservatism is not the same thing as neoconservatism. nor are the interests of corporations always, or even usually, served by war."
the "plop" doctrine
libertariananarchy.com/2008/11/the-plop-doctrine/
klein gives examples of coercive coups and wars, like chile and indonesia, and tries to guilt by association the supposedly free market economists who were involved. however, these acts are clearly unlibertarian. regardless of what happened or who was involved, any coercive act is criminal and antithetical to libertarianism. thus, it is illogical for klein to blame an ideology founded on nonaggression for the deeds of violent criminals. coercion and free markets are mutually exclusive; they cannot go together.
+ 6.43